For years I’ve posted to this blog when I was traveling and exploring Crossfit gyms during my trips. In the beginning (2011) CrossFit was still new and what I learned had new insights. By now Crossfit is a way of life for most of us. Something you do every day, like brushing your teeth.
While there are still things I learn about modalities and WOD formats that surprise me, for most of Crossfit gyms it is all about the same AMRAP, EMOM and RFT formats created for two dozen movements or so. So writing about them becomes less interesting to me.
Maybe a forgotten part of the original Crossfit 100-word prescription to world-class fitness is to Learn and Play New Sports. As I traveled, I always encountered new ways to work out, from the stone-and-steel outside gyms in Ipanema to the long and steep hill climbs on Huashan in China.
Going forward I plan to write more about what happens outside the gyms in places I go and what I may call “new sports”. At least, new to me…
As it’s clear from this blog, in the last 6 years my travels took me to some great Crossfit boxes with a great variety of approaches to programming. I found the background of the head coach determined the philosophy applied to training. Some followed the mainsite years after every box adopted their own training, some brought in gymnastics, endurance training, boxing, climbing and even swimming in the mix. After every trip something stuck with me that shaped my own WOD preferences.
Many times however I was stuck in a town with no CF options and had a hard time finding travel WODs that had the structure and flexibility I liked. WOD should be done in under an hour, have the variety needed, not require a lot of equipment and be fun. More importantly have the structure I liked (AMRAPs, EMOMs) and less of what I don’t (open ended task priority programming).
I tried following many box’s online WODs and even tried Fleeletics. In the end I kept coming back to the programming from a small gym in Hungary, CrossFit Trec. The founders had background in wrestling and in Crossfit Games and they had the structure I wanted. In general the template is something like this:
- EMOM for 10-12 mins of heavy lifts
- EMOM for 8-15 mins of 2-3 alternating movements
- AMRAP 15-25 mins of any and all movements from running, gymnastics to lifts
Every Saturday they would have a 30-40 minute EMOM or AMRAP of 4-6 movements.
The variety, the time structure and the weekly overload kept me coming back to their WODs for 18 months now. Both when traveling and when not.
Some of us tend to have a bias towards task priority (“for time”) and time priority (EMOM, AMRAP) workouts. Over the last 5 years I noticed my tendency to prefer certain programming styles. During my crazy travel schedule I experimented following programming from various boxes and settled for Invictus most of the time. The extensive use of EMOMs during weightlifting sessions and Metcons keep cadence and focus outside the gym.
I noticed that I prefer time priority workouts outside of Benchmark WODs. AMRAPS and EMOMs allow for various athletic abilities to complete the task at the same time while allowing for more and less intensity during the workout. EMOMs in particular I found much higher intensity than the second half of a long WOD.
Being in Europe in the summer I found several gyms that program mostly for time priority and still have immense workload and intensity. It reminds me of visiting a gym 5 years ago that had a week of Tabatas and argued that nothing beats 4-6 tabatas in a row under 20 minutes.
Closeup of athlete holding kettlebell weight
Back in the good old days of the first CrossFit Games, circa 2007, there was a lot of WOD programming of long runs (and the requisite debate about them). Almost a decade later even bumper stickers proudly announce the 0.25 distance so common in our sport.
As we are getting ready for the next CF Open (I’m looking at you overhead lunges), I decided to plan out my long runs for the summer. Spartan Trifectas, 10 milers, city obstacle runs and even great mountain hikes could add a great variety to life in the box. Most importantly I get to finally dust off my 2012 CF Endurance training manual…
With that, I’m heading next week to my favorite run on Montara mountain in Half Moon Bay. Already registered for the Broad Street Run, a Spartan and just maybe a hike in Tibet.
But for now, time to tackle 16.1
I was watching the highlights from the Regionals with a friend when he popped a question that I didn’t have a good answer for: “Every sport has elite players, but what can the average CrossFitter do?”. With millions entering the sport and hundreds of thousands participating in the Open – it is hard to have an exact answer. Each box tracks their own members’ performance but what is the average across regions, ages and experience levels?
Until we find the perfect answer I found an imperfect one that could serve as a good proxy. I looked at key movements in Beyond the Whiteboard where at least 10,000 athletes posted to get a better statistical distribution. Again, no science here as we cannot control the demographics of submissions but the results are still quite insightful. Recognizing that no single person is equally strong or weak in both gymnastics, weightlifting and monostructural movements (meaning the average Joe/Jane may not exist), still here is the
Profile of the Average CrossFitter:
Weightlifting maxes of 50th percentile Crossfitter (male/female)
- Power Clean: 205 / 121 lbs
- Bench Press 230 / 110 lbs
- Back Squat 293 / 174 lbs
- Deadlift 365 / 220 lbs
Gymnastic maxes of 50th percentile Crossfitter (male/female)
- Max unbroken pullups 25 / 13
Monostructural maxes of 50th percentile Crossfitter (male/female)
- Row 500m 1:36 / 1:57
- Row 2000m 7:44 / 8:57
- Run 1 mile 6:56 / 8:14
Benchmarks of 50th percentile Crossfitter (male/female)
- Fran 5:51 / 7:00
- Grace 3:48 / 4:27